Pyss 2 points 3 months ago
One problem with the void idea, though, is that it negates a principle that has reined in astronomy for more than 450 years: namely, that our place in the universe isn't special. When Nicholas Copernicus argued that it made much more sense for the Earth to be revolving around the sun than vice versa, it revolutionized science. Since then, most theories have to pass the Copernican test. If they require our planet to be unique, or our position to be exalted, the ideas often seem unlikely.
Vezquex 0 points 3 months ago
Wow way to plagurise the article above almost word for word, and by the way we do exist in a special place in relation to our orbit around the sun. If the Earth was closer in or farther away our planet would be inhospitable, and beside that point the part about the "copernician principle" is alot of bullshit, the article contridicts it'self in two sentences. Copernicus argued that it made more sense mathematically for the earth to rotate around the sun, also the leading theory at the time was'nt scientific at all, it was simply a doctrine cooked up by the prominent religeous leaders of that time. This void theory makes more sense than than the dark matter/energy theory in fact because it does not require us to invent newexotic particles just to prove itself. In my personal opinion the simplest theory has the most merit, and the void theory seems entirely plausible to me.
Pyss 1 point 3 months ago